A case of Neurospora sitophila causing PD peritonitis.

We describe a rare case of fungal peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis caused by the ascomycete fungus Neurospora sitophila (N. sitophila). The patient had little response to initial antibiotics and PD catheter removal was necessary for source control. The fungal biomarker ß-d-glucan (BDG) was positive prior to N. sitophila being cultured and remained positive for 6 months after discharge. Use of BDG early in the assessment of PD peritonitis may reduce time to definitive therapy in fungal peritonitis.

Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: Improving initial investigations with the implementation of a COVID-19 blood request panel.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust produced trust guidelines for the initial blood investigation of COVID-19 inpatients. However, insufficient education meant inconsistent adherence to this guidance. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the implementation of a COVID-19 blood request panel improves adherence to local trust guidelines. METHOD: Between March and April 2020, initial blood investigations performed for positive COVID-19 cases were compared to guidelines. Results were presented locally and a COVID-19 panel was added to the electronic system that provided prompts for appropriate investigations. A re-audit between May and June 2020 was conducted to assess adherence post-intervention. RESULTS: 383 patients were identified in the initial audit cohort and a sample of 20 patients were re-audited. Adherence to Full Blood Count, Urea and Electrolytes, C-reactive Protein and Liver Function Tests increased to 100% from 99.7% (p = 0.8), 99.2% (p = 0.69), 98.7% (p = 0.61), and 96.6% (p = 0.4) respectively. Coagulation screen adherence increased to 90% from 72.8% (p = 0.09). Appropriate requesting of D dimers increased to 50% from 19.9% (p = 0.001). Inappropriate troponin requesting decreased to 26.3% from 38.9% (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: A user-friendly COVID-19 panel of investigations resulted in improved adherence to guidelines. Clear communication and education are essential to help alleviate uncertainty during a pandemic.

Improving detection of undiagnosed HIV through routine screening in a central London emergency department.

HIV is a global public health issue. Routine testing for HIV should be performed on all 16-59 years old attending emergency departments (EDs) in high-prevalence areas in the UK.In August 2020, Charing Cross Hospital ED, situated in an 'extremely high-prevalence' area, had no formal guidelines on HIV testing. We aimed to increase HIV testing in 16-59 years old attending our ED to 25% by August 2021 through a quality improvement project, based on the Methodology for Improvement Model, performing six Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles over a 12-month period.An initial ED staff survey revealed 55% (n=22/40) of respondents were unsure of national HIV testing guidelines. Barriers to good testing practice included: lack of clarity on protocols for consent and indication, cost and perceived stigmatisation of patient groups. Interventions were employed at regular intervals, including employment of an HIV nurse advocate, inclusion of HIV tests in a blood test careset during ED triage, and updated trust guidelines that reflect national guidelines.Overall, we did achieve our original 12 month aim, with an average testing rate of 28% of our target group between September 2020 and August 2021. Extending the project to January 2022 has resulted in continued improvements in monthly testing rates, reaching 44% in December 2021. Further analysis revealed interventions led to a statistically significant and sustained increase in monthly testing rates on seven occasions.Valuable lessons were learnt in sustaining improvements in a busy department, changing long-held beliefs regarding consent for testing, and education around HIV care in the UK. Project write-up was formatted using the Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) template.

Treatment Outcomes in Adult Tuberculous Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is substantial variation in the reported treatment outcomes for adult tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Data on survival and neurological disability by continent and HIV serostatus are scarce. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize treatment outcomes for adult TBM. Following a systematic literature search (MEDLINE and EMBASE), studies underwent duplicate screening by independent reviewers in 2 stages to assess eligibility for inclusion. Two independent reviewers extracted data from included studies. We employed a random effects model for all meta-analyses. We evaluated heterogeneity by the I 2 statistic. RESULTS: We assessed 2197 records for eligibility; 39 primary research articles met our inclusion criteria, reporting on treatment outcomes for 5752 adults with TBM. The commonest reported outcome measure was 6-month mortality. Pooled 6-month mortality was 24% and showed significant heterogeneity (I 2 > 95%; P < .01). Mortality ranged from 2% to 67% in Asian studies and from 23% to 80% in Sub-Saharan African studies. Mortality was significantly worse in HIV-positive adults at 57% (95% CI, 48%-67%), compared with 16% (95% CI, 10%-24%) in HIV-negative adults (P < .01). Physical disability was reported in 32% (95% CI, 22%-43%) of adult TBM survivors. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies in all meta-analyses, with I 2 statistics consistently >50%. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in adult TBM is high and varies considerably by continent and HIV status. The highest mortality is among HIV-positive adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Standardized reporting of treatment outcomes will be essential to improve future data quality and increase potential for data sharing, meta-analyses, and facilitating multicenter tuberculosis research to improve outcomes.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global pandemic has resulted in unprecedented public health measures. This has impacted the UK education sector with many universities halting campus-based teaching and examinations. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of COVID-19 on final year medical students' examinations and placements in the United Kingdom (UK) and how it might impact their confidence and preparedness going into their first year of foundation training. METHODS: A 10-item online survey was distributed to final year medical students across 33 UK medical schools. The survey was designed by combining dichotomous, multiple choice and likert response scale questions. Participants were asked about the effect that the COVID-19 global pandemic had on final year medical written exams, electives, assistantships and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). The survey also explored the student's confidence and preparedness going into their first year of training under these new unprecedented circumstances. RESULTS: Four hundred forty students from 32 UK medical schools responded. 38.4% (n = 169) of respondents had their final OSCEs cancelled while 43.0% (n = 189) had already completed their final OSCEs before restrictions. 43.0% (n = 189) of assistantship placements were postponed while 77.3% (n = 340) had electives cancelled. The impact of COVID-19 on OSCEs, written examinations and student assistantships significantly affected students' preparedness (respectively p = 0.025, 0.008, 0.0005). In contrast, when measuring confidence, only changes to student assistantships had a significant effect (p = 0.0005). The majority of students feel that measures taken during this pandemic to amend their curricula was necessary. Respondents also agree that assisting in hospitals during the outbreak would be a valuable learning opportunity. CONCLUSIONS: The impact on medical student education has been significant, particularly affecting the transition from student to doctor. This study showed the disruptions to student assistantships had the biggest effect on students' confidence and preparedness. For those willing to assist in hospitals to join the front-line workforce, it is crucial to maintain their wellbeing with safeguards such as proper inductions, support and supervision.